Please select those areas where you witnessed significant improvement for your participating students.
| Yes |
No |
Area of Potential Impact |
| 0 |
1 |
Improved math comprehension and ability |
| 0 |
1 |
Increased registration for advanced math courses |
| 0 |
1 |
Improved science comprehension and ability |
| 0 |
1 |
Increased registration for advanced science courses |
| 1 |
0 |
Improved Communication skills (Written or Oral) |
| 1 |
0 |
Improved subject grades |
| 0 |
1 |
Improved standardized test scores |
| 1 |
0 |
Improved critical thinking skills |
| 1 |
0 |
Improved teamwork |
| 0 |
1 |
Improved school attendence |
| 1 |
0 |
Increase in self-directed learning |
| 1 |
0 |
Increase integration of knowledge across subject areas and interest areas |
| 1 |
0 |
Increase in knowledge of the workplace |
| 1 |
0 |
Increased desire to become a proactive learner |
| 1 |
0 |
Increased desire to go to college |
| 1 |
0 |
Other areas |
Please describe additional areas that may have been impacted by this program.
The ability to take constructive criticism and incorporate it into a project was greatly enhanced. Also, the awareness of the importance of a mentor was raised.
Please indicate the percentage of your students who are actively moving in the direction of becoming proactive learners.
85%
I have a better understanding of the importance of doing well in math.
There was a requirement placed on each student to complete a number of
interactions with their mentor over time. Each interaction resulted in a
connection with the mentors which in turn fostered self-directed learning in
pursuit of the goals of the project.
How many students would you prefer to directly supervise in the program next year?
24
Please provide some tips on how we can partner with you to expand the program in your area.
Possible present to DECA at a national or regional level as an opportunity.
How would you rate the quality of the matches between your students and mentors overall on a scale of 1 - 5?
4
Please describe any changes you'd like to see that might further improve the quality of the matches.
Reinforcement that feedback needs to be honest and critical no matter
how blunt.
Describe a few things you and your students and mentors were able to accomplish through this program that would have been difficult or impossible any other way.
Real world applications and experiences were show to the students that
would have never seen without the input of the mentors.
How would you rate the quality of the help you received from the International Telementor Center staff throughout this project on a scale of 1 - 5?
5
How often were you able to communicate with the mentor group as a whole?
Weekly
How often were your students able to communicate, on average, with the mentors?
Weekly
Describe significant changes that you would like to see in the program or school environment that would improve the effectiveness of the program for you and your students. Please note who would be responsible for making those changes.
More emphasis by the teacher to the importance of regular communication
and a policy which insures said contact.
How has this program assisted you to use technology more effectively?
It forces me to make sure I am organized and the students are taking
advantage of the online system.
Please note the impact this program has had on meeting state or national standards on a scale of 1 - 5. Where 1 is none and 5 is signifigant
5
Please describe this impact, if any, in your own words.
The DECA guidelines are based on real-world situations and standards.
These are echoed by the mentors to the students resulting in better
projects.
If "students at-risk" are defined as those who have low motivation to learn, what percentage of the students you supervised this year met this criterion.
50%
When you applied to be a teacher contact you were asked to meet the following requirements.
- All student/mentor commmunication is project based
- Participating students receive a subject grade and turn in work at least biweekly
- Teachers should communicate at least biweekly with the mentors
- Students should be self-selected for participation.
- Teachers should expect a high degree of accountability from their students.
- Teachers should respond to specific program problems within 48 hours
How many requirements you were able to meet this year.
6
Please describe which requirements, if any, helped you be successful in the program?
The timeline and the communication/contact standards and followup.
Please describe which requirements, if any, were difficult to meet. Please note why these requirements were difficult to meet.
Submitting work biweekly is challenging depending on the stage of the
project.
If you were helping a new teacher start in this program, what advice would you offer that would aid this new teacher and his or her students to be successful participants?
Be organized and flexible with the schedule.
Do you plan to participate in the program next year?
Yes
Please estimate how many students in your school district or city could take advantage of this program next year?
80
What additional training would you recommend for teachers next year?
A video overview of expectations for teachers and students that is
available on the website might be helpful.
