Project Overview

Project: 2013 Fall - Business Planning Project
Teacher: Lynne Chrismer
School: Holt High School
Location: 600 Campus Drive
Start Date: 09/11/2013
End Date: 03/08/2014

Participant Totals
Student Participants: 12
Mentor Participants: 11

Survey Totals
Teacher Survey: 1
Student Surveys: 12
Mentor Surveys: 11

Teacher Project Survey Results

Please select those areas where you witnessed significant improvement for your participating students.
Yes No Area of Potential Impact
0 1 Improved math comprehension and ability
0 1 Increased registration for advanced math courses
0 1 Improved science comprehension and ability
0 1 Increased registration for advanced science courses
1 0 Improved Communication skills (Written or Oral)
1 0 Improved subject grades
1 0 Improved standardized test scores
1 0 Improved critical thinking skills
1 0 Improved teamwork
0 1 Improved school attendence
1 0 Increase in self-directed learning
1 0 Increase integration of knowledge across subject areas and interest areas
1 0 Increase in knowledge of the workplace
1 0 Increased desire to become a proactive learner
0 1 Increased desire to go to college
1 0 Other areas


Please describe additional areas that may have been impacted by this program.
Improved writing skills and analysis skills of charts and graphs. These will help tremendously as students continue to take standardized test and the ACT exam.


Please indicate the percentage of your students who are actively moving in the direction of becoming proactive learners.
50%


I have a better understanding of the importance of doing well in math.
Students needed to first develop a goal for their project and implement steps to attain the goal. The telementors helped to redirect some of those goals and steps so the students were successful.


How many students would you prefer to directly supervise in the program next year?
30


Please provide some tips on how we can partner with you to expand the program in your area.
I think the best way to initiate more involvement would be to work with the middle schools and their PLTW programs.


How would you rate the quality of the matches between your students and mentors overall on a scale of 1 - 5?
4


Please describe any changes you'd like to see that might further improve the quality of the matches.


Describe a few things you and your students and mentors were able to accomplish through this program that would have been difficult or impossible any other way.
The mentors provided an education on the depth of content. They were able to assess how well each of their own students could interpretate information and then would take the content into a greater depth/detail if the student was able to understand at that level.


How would you rate the quality of the help you received from the International Telementor Center staff throughout this project on a scale of 1 - 5?
3


How often were you able to communicate with the mentor group as a whole?
Biweekly


How often were your students able to communicate, on average, with the mentors?
Biweekly


Describe significant changes that you would like to see in the program or school environment that would improve the effectiveness of the program for you and your students. Please note who would be responsible for making those changes.
I believe that it could be beneficial for the mentors to be able to see the feedback other mentors were providing. I am not sure on how to make that work.


How has this program assisted you to use technology more effectively?
We already implement technology this did not ultimately change anything we already do.


Please note the impact this program has had on meeting state or national standards on a scale of 1 - 5. Where 1 is none and 5 is signifigant
5


Please describe this impact, if any, in your own words.
Critical Thinking Skills, Analytical Skills, Writing abilitly Implementation of State and National Marketing Education Competencies and Objectives


If "students at-risk" are defined as those who have low motivation to learn, what percentage of the students you supervised this year met this criterion.
75%


When you applied to be a teacher contact you were asked to meet the following requirements.
  1. All student/mentor commmunication is project based
  2. Participating students receive a subject grade and turn in work at least biweekly
  3. Teachers should communicate at least biweekly with the mentors
  4. Students should be self-selected for participation.
  5. Teachers should expect a high degree of accountability from their students.
  6. Teachers should respond to specific program problems within 48 hours
How many requirements you were able to meet this year.
5


Please describe which requirements, if any, helped you be successful in the program?


Please describe which requirements, if any, were difficult to meet. Please note why these requirements were difficult to meet.


If you were helping a new teacher start in this program, what advice would you offer that would aid this new teacher and his or her students to be successful participants?
To be very descriptive in the feedback you give your mentors. The more information, directions, and advice you give the greater the impact they will make on the students.


Do you plan to participate in the program next year?
Yes


Please estimate how many students in your school district or city could take advantage of this program next year?
100


What additional training would you recommend for teachers next year?
I do not have any reccomendations at this time.